• 22597340
  • 87216931
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • L-V de 8:00 a.m. a 3:00 p.m.
Territorial information for projects

Mapping and Territorial Management for Projects

We integrate mapping, spatial analysis and territorial information to understand properties, compare alternatives and guide decisions throughout project development.

We turn geographic data into actionable knowledge to identify conditions, relationships and opportunities across the territory.

Properties and projects We connect available information with a specific site, location and practical need.
Spatial analysis We integrate maps, geographic data and multiple information sources to understand the territory.
Territorial decisions We turn information into useful criteria for comparing options, planning and defining next steps.
Understand before deciding

A property is part of a wider territory

Property boundaries show where a parcel lies, but alone they do not explain its conditions, relationships or development potential. Understanding a property also requires looking at the surrounding territory.

Property

What conditions exist within the site?

Terrain, drainage, land cover, access and other characteristics provide an initial understanding of the property.

  • Shape and dimensions
  • Slopes and landforms
  • Watercourses and drainage
  • Access and existing features
Surroundings

How does the property relate to its surroundings?

A property interacts with roads, water bodies, infrastructure, urban areas, natural spaces and other features that can influence its development.

  • Connectivity and accessibility
  • Nearby infrastructure
  • Environmental and natural conditions
  • Surrounding land uses and characteristics
Project

What does this information mean for the proposed development?

The same territorial condition may have different implications depending on the project type, scale, location of works and decisions involved.

  • Intended property use
  • Proposed development areas
  • Access and infrastructure needs
  • Conditions requiring closer attention
An integrated perspective

Information becomes valuable when we understand how it relates across the territory

A slope map, road, stream, reported hazard or territorial restriction can be examined individually, but its true significance emerges when considered in relation to the property and project.

Combining different sources helps reveal patterns, overlaps, constraints and opportunities that may be missed when information is reviewed separately.

Understanding the territory means more than locating features on a map: it means interpreting the relationships that matter for the decision at hand.

Terrain Slopes, valleys, watersheds and landforms influence access, drainage and potential uses.
Water Watercourses, drainage, wetlands and water resources may have important relationships with the property.
Connectivity Roads, access points, infrastructure and distances help explain how a site connects to its surroundings.
Context Land use, institutional information, natural conditions and surrounding characteristics complete the territorial picture.
Turn information into sound judgment

From data to decisions

Geographic information can come from many sources, scales and periods. We organize, connect and interpret it to answer specific questions about a property or project.

01 · Information

Bring together what we know about the territory

We integrate maps, databases, images, background records, institutional information and available project data.

  • Thematic mapping
  • Institutional information
  • Images and background records
  • Property and project data
02 · Spatial relationships

Understand where each feature is located

Spatial analysis connects the property with territorial features and identifies proximity, intersections, overlaps and patterns.

  • Location and proximity
  • Information overlays
  • Distribution within the property
  • Relationships with surroundings
03 · Interpretation

Determine which relationships really matter

Not every spatial overlap implies a restriction, and the absence of a feature from a map does not prove it is absent on the ground. Information must be interpreted in context and at the appropriate scale.

  • Scale and accuracy
  • Territorial context
  • Information quality
  • Relevance to project objectives
04 · Decision

Turn analysis into a next step

The outcome should help determine what to investigate further, which alternatives to compare, what information to verify and what conditions to address in planning.

  • Project priorities
  • Location alternatives
  • Information requiring verification
  • Further studies or actions
More than making maps

A map shows where things are; territorial analysis helps explain what they mean

Plotting information about a property is only part of the task. Its value lies in linking that information to a specific question and explaining the implications for the project.

The same map layer may be irrelevant to one project but essential to another. Interpretation depends on location, scale, objectives and the territory's particular characteristics.

Geographic information is valuable when it helps people decide what to do with a site.

Source We identify where information originates and how reliable it is for the question being assessed.
Scale Regional information is not always detailed enough for property-level decisions.
Context Each feature must be understood within its surrounding physical, urban and territorial conditions.
Objective Relevant information depends on the decision the client needs to make about the property or project.
Understand a property before proceeding

Territorial Property Assessment

We combine geographic, territorial and technical information to develop an initial understanding of a property, identify significant conditions and guide decisions before purchasing, designing or investing.

Purchase

Before buying a property

An early territorial review can reveal conditions worth understanding before making substantial purchase or investment commitments.

  • General site conditions
  • Known hazards and background information
  • Relationship to water and drainage
  • Matters requiring verification
Development

Before defining a project

Understanding the property from the outset connects site conditions with planned construction areas, access and infrastructure.

  • Terrain and slopes
  • Watercourses and low-lying areas
  • Accessibility
  • Territorial constraints
Investment

Before investing in detailed studies and permits

An initial assessment helps identify which issues deserve attention before resources are committed to more detailed investigations.

  • Available information
  • Information gaps
  • Priority conditions
  • Study requirements
Initial consultation

When it is unclear where to begin

When the necessary study, procedure or site condition is not yet known, the assessment provides an initial approach to the project.

  • Initial site review
  • Identification of relevant issues
  • Prioritization of questions
  • Guidance on next steps
A comprehensive perspective

The property is examined as a set of conditions that must be interpreted together

Depending on project objectives, we can integrate information on property boundaries, terrain, drainage, geology, natural hazards, water resources, accessibility, land cover, surroundings and available institutional records.

The aim is not to collect map layers but to identify which conditions may genuinely influence the client's decision and which require further review or study.

A territorial assessment provides an integrated first look at the property: what we know, what needs attention and what should be investigated before proceeding.

What is there? We identify relevant features, conditions and background information on the property and in its surroundings.
Where is it? We spatially relate information to property boundaries and project areas of interest.
What might it mean? We interpret conditions within their territorial context and intended development use.
What should be reviewed? We flag issues requiring verification, further analysis or a specific technical study.
Turn information into useful criteria

What can a territorial assessment reveal?

The aim is not merely to identify features on a property, but to recognize which may affect a decision, what appears favorable and what information should be verified before proceeding.

Constraints

Areas requiring greater attention

Certain natural, territorial or institutional conditions may be concentrated in particular parts of the property and need to be considered during planning.

  • Slopes or low-lying areas
  • Watercourses and drainage
  • Reported hazards
  • Other territorial constraints
Opportunities

Areas with relatively favorable conditions

Territorial analysis can identify areas that offer relatively better conditions for specific activities, access or project components.

  • More favorable terrain
  • Better accessibility
  • Fewer overlapping constraints
  • Site layout alternatives
Uncertainty

Information requiring verification

Available information varies in accuracy. An assessment can identify data, boundaries or conditions needing further confirmation.

  • General mapping information
  • Outdated or incomplete data
  • Conditions requiring field checks
  • Features requiring more detail
Next steps

Studies or decisions to prioritize

When a condition is significant, the assessment helps determine what additional information, technical study or decision should be addressed before proceeding.

  • Specific checks
  • Technical studies
  • Planning adjustments
  • Action priorities
More than finding problems

A territorial assessment also helps identify opportunities within a property

Understanding the territory is not only about locating restrictions. It can also reveal variations within a property, relatively favorable areas and alternatives to consider in project planning.

A condition that limits one area does not necessarily affect the entire property. Likewise, an apparently favorable area should be interpreted in light of all relevant territorial relationships.

The goal is not to label a property as good or bad, but to better understand its potential, constraints and uncertainties before making a decision.

Address Conditions that may directly influence project planning or development.
Make use of Areas or territorial relationships that may offer better conditions for particular uses.
Verify Information whose scale, accuracy or currency needs confirmation before guiding a decision.
Investigate further Conditions warranting specific technical analysis or study before proceeding.
Compare before choosing

Territorial Analysis of Alternatives

When several properties, locations or site layout options exist, territorial analysis allows them to be compared using spatial criteria and reveals meaningful differences before a decision is made.

Properties

Compare different plots

Two properties may appear similar in price, location or size while differing considerably in their territorial conditions.

  • Terrain and slopes
  • Accessibility
  • Hazards and constraints
  • Relationship to surroundings
Areas within a property

Compare areas of the same property

A property may contain areas with very different characteristics. Examining them helps identify more suitable options for specific activities.

  • Gentler slopes
  • Potential access routes
  • Natural conditions
  • Distribution of constraints
Site layout

Evaluate alternative locations for structures

Buildings, access, infrastructure and other components can be spatially assessed to compare their relationship with existing site conditions.

  • Development areas
  • Access and infrastructure
  • Relationship to terrain
  • Nearby territorial conditions
Location

Identify where to search

When no property has yet been selected, territorial criteria can help target the search toward areas that better meet project needs.

  • Areas of interest
  • Distances and accessibility
  • Required conditions
  • Exclusion of less suitable areas
There is no universally best alternative

The comparison must address the project's specific objective

A property may offer excellent conditions for one use but be less suitable for another. Criteria should therefore be selected according to actual project needs rather than a generic formula.

Analysis organizes comparable information, identifies advantages and constraints, and explains the factors behind differences among the alternatives considered.

Comparing alternatives is not just about scoring them: it is about understanding why one option may better address a particular need.

What works in its favor? We identify conditions that may offer relative advantages for the project.
What creates constraints? We identify restrictions, difficulties and features that may require closer attention.
What makes it different? We examine the factors behind the main territorial differences among alternatives.
What needs checking? We indicate what information must be verified before making a final decision.
Compare with a clear question in mind

Compare using criteria, not just impressions

Territorial comparison brings different variables into a common framework to assess how each alternative responds to the project's actual needs.

Site

Physical site conditions

Terrain and other natural characteristics can create significant differences between properties or between areas of the same property.

  • Slopes and topography
  • Watercourses and drainage
  • Low-lying or steep areas
  • Overall site configuration
Accessibility

Connections to infrastructure and services

Location should also be evaluated in relation to roads, existing infrastructure, distances and connections needed for the project to operate.

  • Existing access routes
  • Nearby road network
  • Relevant distances
  • Available infrastructure
Constraints

Factors that may limit or change an alternative

Natural hazards, water bodies, territorial restrictions and other conditions may have different implications depending on the location considered.

  • Reported hazards
  • Water resources
  • Environmental conditions
  • Relevant institutional information
Project

Criteria based on the proposed development

Each project may require specific variables that are less important for other kinds of development.

  • Required area
  • Site layout needs
  • Relationship to users or activities
  • Other specific criteria
Not all criteria carry equal weight

The importance of each variable depends on the decision the project needs to make

A given slope, distance or proximity to infrastructure may be crucial for one project and of little importance for another.

Where appropriate, comparison criteria can be organized and weighted to make priorities explicit and understand how they affect the results.

Useful territorial analysis should explain not only which alternative scores better but also which criteria account for that difference.

Relevance We use variables directly related to the project's decision.
Comparability We organize information so alternatives can be assessed using equivalent criteria.
Priority We recognize that some factors may matter more than others depending on project objectives.
Traceability The comparison should show what information and criteria support each conclusion.
Applied geographic information

Mapping and Spatial Analysis

We organize, display and analyze geographic information to answer questions about properties, projects and the territory. Each mapping product is developed according to the available information and the decision it must support.

Mapping

Thematic maps for studies and projects

We present territorial information clearly and systematically to support technical analyses, planning, reports and decision-making.

  • Property mapping
  • Thematic maps
  • Maps for technical reports
  • Presentation of results
Spatial analysis

Understand relationships across the territory

We use geographic analysis tools to examine proximity, overlaps, distributions, distances and other relevant spatial relationships.

  • Proximity and areas of influence
  • Variable overlays
  • Distance analysis
  • Spatial distribution of conditions
Information integration

Combine different sources into a coherent picture

We integrate institutional information, existing maps, field data, imagery and background records to establish a consistent territorial basis for the project.

  • Institutional information
  • Project-specific data
  • Imagery and historical maps
  • Field-collected information
Geographic information

Databases and georeferenced inventories

We organize spatial information for future consultation, updating and use within the project or in later phases of analysis.

  • Geographic databases
  • Georeferenced inventories
  • Information digitization
  • Structuring territorial data
Every project needs different information

Maps are developed around the question we need to answer

The same territory can be represented in many ways. Useful information depends on the map's purpose, working scale and the decisions to be made from it.

We can therefore combine different variables, levels of detail and sources depending on whether the aim is to assess a property, compare alternatives, document a project or communicate technical findings.

We do not start with a predetermined map: we start with a territorial question and develop the information needed to answer it.

Locate Locate properties, infrastructure, territorial conditions and other features relevant to the project.
Connect Analyze proximity, overlap and relationships among geographic variables.
Measure Calculate distances, areas, slopes and other spatial variables needed for analysis.
Communicate Turn complex technical and territorial information into more understandable maps.
Make territorial information understandable

Mapping to Understand and Communicate

A map can summarize complex territorial relationships and make them easier for clients, technical teams, authorities and users to understand. We design mapping products around the information to be communicated and the audience interpreting it.

Reports

Maps for technical documents

We organize spatial information for studies, assessments, applications and other documents where a condition needs to be explained geographically.

  • Location maps
  • Thematic mapping
  • Results maps
  • Figures for technical reports
Projects

Maps for meetings and decision-making

Clear visual representations help compare options, explain constraints and establish a shared geographic reference for people involved in a project.

  • Location alternatives
  • Site conditions
  • Project components
  • Information for technical coordination
Territorial interpretation

Spatial information to guide users

We structure geographic information to explain routes, points of interest, distances and relevant site characteristics in an accessible way.

  • Routes and itineraries
  • Points of interest
  • Distances and reference points
  • Site-specific geographic information
Trails

Trail mapping and information

We survey and organize route information to support maps, route references and content for trail wayfinding and interpretation.

  • Route mapping
  • Distances and elevation profiles
  • Points of interest
  • Signage information
The same territory can be communicated in different ways

An effective map must suit both the information and its intended users

A technical-report map need not communicate in the same way as one made for a meeting, field visit or trail wayfinding.

Variables, scale, detail, symbology and content should suit the product's purpose without adding information that unnecessarily complicates interpretation.

Mapping does more than represent the territory: it organizes information so others can understand and use it.

Summarize Bring complex information together in a clear, structured geographic representation.
Explain Show spatial relationships that may be difficult to understand through text or tables alone.
Guide Support wayfinding, travel and spatial understanding of features within an area.
Share Create a common geographic reference for clients, technical teams and other stakeholders.
Organize information, studies and decisions

Territorial Project Management

A project may require multiple studies, information sources, technical decisions and institutional procedures. We organize these elements from a territorial perspective to help define priorities, dependencies and next steps.

Information

Organize what already exists

We gather background records, studies, maps, documents and available territorial information to build a clearer picture of the project's status.

  • Previous studies
  • Maps and databases
  • Institutional information
  • Project documentation
Needs

Identify what remains unresolved

We examine site conditions and project objectives to identify the information, studies or checks that may be needed before proceeding.

  • Information gaps
  • Outstanding studies
  • Conditions requiring verification
  • Relevant technical requirements
Sequence

Determine what should be addressed first

Some studies or decisions depend on prior information. Organizing these dependencies can avoid duplicated work or moving prematurely into phases awaiting other decisions.

  • Priorities
  • Dependencies between studies
  • Work sequence
  • Territorial project milestones
Follow-up

Maintain an integrated view of the process

As the project progresses, new decisions, observations or results may change priorities and require adjustments to the original work plan.

  • Status of studies
  • Pending information
  • Observations and requirements
  • Updates to next steps
An integrated view of the process

Project studies cannot always be treated as independent elements

Information obtained at one stage may determine what must be examined next. Likewise, a territorial condition identified early may change design decisions, subsequent studies or institutional requirements.

Managing a project from a territorial perspective means keeping these relationships visible and organizing the process so that each decision draws on the right information at the right time.

The aim is not to add more stages but to organize those genuinely needed and reduce decisions made without sufficient territorial information.

What we know We consolidate available information and records to establish the project's starting point.
What is missing We identify gaps, checks and studies that may be necessary to proceed.
What depends on what We identify dependencies among studies, decisions, information and project phases.
What comes next We organize priorities and next steps into a clear work plan.
Turn complexity into a work plan

Organizing the Project Path

When a project involves multiple studies, decisions and requirements, organizing the process helps establish what needs resolving, what information takes priority and how the various phases relate to each other.

01 · Starting point

Understand the current status

We review existing information to establish what is known about the site, which decisions have been made and what project components have been defined.

  • Available information
  • Completed studies
  • Decisions already made
  • Overall project status
02 · Priorities

Identify what must be addressed first

Certain territorial questions may shape subsequent decisions. Recognizing them early helps focus efforts where more information is needed.

  • Critical conditions
  • Information gaps
  • Outstanding decisions
  • Factors that may affect later phases
03 · Dependencies

Identify what information depends on other information

A study, procedure or decision may require previous results before it can proceed. Organizing these dependencies creates a more logical work sequence.

  • Necessary preliminary studies
  • Information feeding later phases
  • Conditional decisions
  • Relationships among technical components
04 · Roadmap

Define the next steps

Once the main dependencies have been identified, we can organize a work plan that makes it easier to track studies, decisions and territorial requirements.

  • Sequence of actions
  • Key milestones
  • Pending information
  • Upcoming decisions
Address matters at the right time

Not everything needs to be studied at once or in equal detail

Some decisions can rely on existing information, while others require further checks or studies. The sequence depends on site characteristics, project status and the questions to be answered.

Organizing the process helps avoid premature investigations, identify information that can serve several phases and direct technical resources to issues that genuinely affect progress.

Managing a project does not mean studying everything from the outset. It means knowing what information is needed, when it is needed and which decision it will support.

Prioritize Focus first on questions that could change later decisions.
Sequence Arrange studies and actions according to their dependencies and information needs.
Update Incorporate new results, observations and decisions as the project progresses.
Keep perspective Prevent isolated studies and procedures from obscuring the project's overall objective.
Verify and develop site information

Territorial Information and Fieldwork

When available information cannot answer a territorial question in sufficient detail, we can complement it with on-site observations, surveys and georeferenced inventories.

Surveying

Record relevant territorial features

We georeference features needed for analysis that may not be shown in sufficient detail on existing maps.

  • Points and features of interest
  • Routes and travel paths
  • Drainage and infrastructure
  • Conditions observed in the field
Inventories

Organize georeferenced information

Recorded features can be structured into spatial inventories for easier consultation, classification and use during later stages.

  • Territorial features
  • Infrastructure and assets
  • Points of interest
  • Location-linked records
Verification

Compare mapping with actual conditions

Site visits allow us to check previously identified features and recognize differences between available information and current conditions on the ground.

  • Feature locations
  • Current conditions
  • Changes since previous records
  • Items requiring updates
Documentation

Link observations, photographs and locations

Field information can be documented spatially, preserving a clear record of where each condition was observed and how it relates to the territory.

  • Georeferenced photographs
  • Field observations
  • Condition records
  • Spatial references for reports
From desktop to field

Fieldwork verifies what available information actually represents

Imagery, maps and databases help identify questions before a property visit. Fieldwork checks them against current conditions and produces additional information where needed.

Collected data can then be reintegrated into project maps, connected to other variables and used in analyses, reports or monitoring processes.

Fieldwork and mapping are not separate stages: they complement each other to create a more complete and current representation of the territory.

Prepare We use existing information to identify the features worth checking or surveying on site.
Record We capture observations and features with geographic references so they can be incorporated into the project.
Integrate We connect collected data with maps, background records and other territorial sources.
Update New information can be added to inventories, maps and geographic databases for future use.
From initial assessment to the necessary study

A territorial review may identify conditions that require specialist knowledge or studies. Initial information then helps define the question to be answered and the level of analysis the project requires.

Environmental assessment

When the project needs to examine its environmental constraints

Location, project characteristics and site conditions may trigger environmental requirements to be assessed through the relevant procedures.

  • Environmental approval
  • Project constraints
  • Supporting territorial information
  • Institutional requirements
Hydrogeology

When groundwater is part of the decision

Wells, groundwater levels, aquifers, infiltration or potential impacts on water resources may call for a specific hydrogeological assessment.

  • Hydrogeological conditions
  • Groundwater
  • Water resource protection
  • Specific hydrogeological studies
Geology and geotechnics

When we need to understand the land and subsurface better

Geological characteristics, subsurface materials or stability conditions may require more detailed investigations.

  • Site geology
  • Subsurface conditions
  • Geotechnical investigations
  • Specific site characterization
Water resources

When the project needs to use or manage water

Existing wells, water supply needs, concessions and other water uses may lead to specific studies and administrative procedures.

  • Wells
  • Water availability
  • Concessions and permits
  • Water resource management
Natural hazards

When natural conditions may affect the project

Landslides, faulting, flooding, volcanic activity and other hazards may require specific assessment of their relationship with the property.

  • Slopes and mass movements
  • Faulting and seismicity
  • Flooding and runoff
  • Other site-specific hazards
First, identify the question

Not every project needs to start with every possible study

An initial territorial review helps distinguish conditions that can be resolved using existing information from those that truly warrant more detailed technical investigation.

This helps direct the project toward studies, checks and procedures that address a concrete need, rather than turning every potential territorial issue into a separate investigation from the outset.

First we identify what the project needs to understand; then we determine the study or procedure that can answer that question.

01

Identify

We recognize territorial conditions potentially relevant to the property or project.

02

Prioritize

We determine which conditions really need closer attention before proceeding.

03

Investigate

We direct analysis toward the technical study, verification or procedure appropriate to the identified question.

Initial guidance

What do you need to resolve about your property or project?

You do not need to know in advance which analysis, map or study you need. We can begin with the property, available information and the decision you face.

We can start with a question

Tell us what property, information or decision you need help with

Share the location, project objectives and any available information. We can help determine which territorial analysis, mapping, study or next step best suits your situation.